Since the script has been set in stone now that production
has been completed, I feel that it is necessary to inform viewers of the
significance of the theme.
In literature, an
analogue “is an individual motif, character, scene, event or phrase that
resembles one found in another work.” (Miller, 2011) Etymologically, the word “analogue” is
derived from the root word “analogy”, which in Greek philosophy, is a study of
similarity and shared abstractions. Analogia is used commonly by Medieval
and Roman lawyers in the practices of reasoning. To this day, analogical reasoning is a common
way for people to grasp new ideas and understand the world around them. These connections, be it thematic or
deductive; in which one object compared to another creates deeper meaning and
greater truth, are manifested in discourse and rhetoric in the form of similes
and metaphors. An analogue therefore is
an abstract thematic bridge that drops all pretense of time, space, and
objectivity, allowing it to connect any two objects together (no matter how
different or contradictory they may appear) through thematic similarity. A keen example is Harper Lee’s 1960 novel, To
Kill a Mockingbird: the titular mockingbird, a symbol of innocence, is used
again and again to thematically unite the novel’s diverse range of characters.
The design of the art piece is based off the idea of hypertext and hypermedia, in which the story is conveyed through a jumbled amalgam of text, pictures, and video, putting it in the near-same category of interactive fiction (the sequence or omission of certain storylines will alter the viewer's perception of the work).
Red Ribbon is short film/trailer that delves into the
backstory of a minor (but critical) character in one of my larger literary
works. Torn between her estranged
husband and her childhood love, the story focuses on her personal struggle to
gain independence and find her own way.
The other parts of the story (currently still in progress)
can be found here:
The film deliberately avoids explicit mention of any
analogies or references; instead, it permeats the theme and presentation in
subtle ways. I am not content with comparing
mere abstractions together to get the point across; instead, the film is
designed to be an embodiment of the concept in general. Overall, there are three different “levels”
of analogue within the artwork.
-
A recurring image; that of Agnes walking down a
railway track is a symbol of life as a linear journey. This is the only explicit example of an
analogue that remains in the script.
o
An older version of the script called for a reference
of Agnes’ suffering to that of the Wenzhou train derailment, but this idea was
scrapped because it was 1) deemed too cliché and 2) overextended the film’s
scope.
-
The structure of the film’s mis-en-scene is
heavily based on the concept of analogue.
Instead of presenting the chain of events in a linear sequence, time and
space are distorted and rearranged in a way that allows the viewer to
immediately see the thematic connections between widely divergent events.
o
For example, there is no technical correlation
between Agnes’ running away from home and her accident: it is only apparent by
the way the sequence is presented that one sees that both scenarios are the
consequences of her actions.
-
An analogue is a synthesis of multiple different
sources, implicitly stated. The film
itself does not make extensive references to the larger literary work as a
whole: it is fully capable of standing on its own, but its effects are greatly
amplified if one is exposed to the other relevant segments as well.
o
The title of the installation may initially
confuse some viewers in that the film does not reference any ribbon at all. However, the ribbon is part of the
installation, and viewers will see that the ribbon holds the installation
together. This fulfills a much larger
analogy that this film (and the character Agnes) is what really unites the
larger story together.
Citations:
Miller, Frederic P., Agnes F. Vandome, and John McBrewster. Analogue (Literature). N.p.: VDM, 2011.